Kitarat: kitarakamat ›

Crossfire96: Entäpä hopea-ja mustanaamojen erot ja pari kysymystä on jäänyt vastausta vaille.
 
Jostain luin, että "Blackfacet saundaa muutaman satasen kalliimmilta, kuin Silverfacet" 8)
 
Tämmöinen aika hyvä "Summary" löytyi , mutta kuten sanottua erot on aika marginaalisia ja yksilökohtaisia, ja loput sitä kuuluisaa "mojoa" (Viimeksi mainittuun kuuluu Point to Point johdotuksen vaikutukset soundiin versus piirilevykytkentään)
 
"Tweed's (which is what I think you mean by "Champ") have a lot of midrange and less headroom (both as a result of the midrange and the power amp design). Lots of bottom end, but it's loose and undirected and the highs oll off early. They break-up early have have a big, loose, unfocused, organic feel to their overdrive. "Brown." Lo-Fi. Think '50's raunchy blues tones.
 
Brownface's started to shave a little of the midrange out, and bump up the headroom. Still fairly dirty machines, but more focused and tighter sounded.
 
Blackface, this is when Fender got it's signature tone. Scooped midrange; tighter, punchier low end that is more prominent and a bright, snappy high end. This is the tone most people usually think of when they think "Fender." When overdriven you don't get the big, fat, warm, mushy, organic, you get a much tighter, brighter sizzle. Tweed OD Generally, BF models are warmer than their SF counterparts.
 
Silverface, voiced the same as Blackface, still has that Fender tone, but larger power supplies up the headroom and give an overall cleaney shimmer to the tone. If I were looking for '70's country or Fender clean tones, I would go with a Silverface (and, actually, I *do* prefer the SF simmer over the more bluesy BF). The real downside for SF models is that construction suffered due to faster turnaround and cheaper materials. TO compensate, there is usually some added filtering in the design."