Media ja viihde ›

Stradlin: Lähinnä meinasin tuota, että äijä ei kuole vaan halvaantuu ja sitten pohditaan onko se itsenäisesti ajatteleva ihminen vai pelkkä robotti. En ymmärrä.
 
Joo siis tuossa on nyt taas toimittaja käynyt vähän oikomassa mutkia, kuten tapana on :)
 
Joel Kinnaman itse kertoili siis alunperin näin:
 
And that is very much the question: is he now a property? Is he owned by OmniCorp?
 
Hes very vulnerable because the system needs to be changed and needs to be plugged in. So he is dependent on this corporation that has made him to survive. That has made him very powerful but at the same time very vulnerable. Theres continuous interactions. They let him interact with his family. He gets to reconnect with his family after he becomes RoboCop and that is of course something that is not easy to come home and try to embrace your six-year-old son and your wife when you have just a big robotic body and you cant really feel them.
 
http://screenrant.com/robocop-movie … -rating-pg-13-origin-story-details/
 
Miusta toi kuulostaa itse asiassa ihan hyvältä meiningiltä. Veikkaan, että tuohon suuntaan Aronofskykin olisi lähtenyt, jos olisi ohjaajan puikoissa aikoinaan jatkanut.
 
Ikärajasta vielä:
 
MPAA but he shot RoboCop with the intention of showing it to a PG-13 audience (in the interest of maximizing box office potential):
 
I dont get to make the decision. We screen the movie to the MPAA and they will tell us. I mean we were shooting the movie to be seen by the broadest possible audience which means PG-13. This whole idea that RoboCop has to be R-Rated because the first RoboCop was amazingly violent and was R-Rated, I never really bought into that. You know, Dark Knight is PG-13 so you can get away with a lot these days with PG-13.
 
Toki sieltä voi tulla sitten ihan kamalaa paskaakin, mutta lähtökohdat on ihan jees. Ohjaaja on kova (Tropa de Elite) ja cast (Kinnaman, Keaton, Jackson, Oldman, Haley) ja tosiaan ihan mielenkiintoinen tulokulma. Kassellaan.